Doing Something To Help The Health Of Our Oceans.

April 11, 2010 8 Comments

Dear EarthTalk: Oceans are in big trouble and I understand President Obama is creating a high level ocean council to address them. What are the major issues?

Our oceans are indeed in a terrible state, thanks primarily to unrestrained commercial and industrial activity. Overfishing and pollution have decimated once abundant stocks of fish and other marine life, and the damaging practices continue to this day despite international agreements outlawing them.

Our appetite for seafood has pushed three-quarters of the world’s fisheries to or beyond the limits of sustainability, while nine out of 10 of the sea’s large fish like tuna and swordfish have disappeared. And while it is still unclear what toll global warming will have on oceans – coral reefs dying and powerful ocean currents shifting or shutting down are two scary scenarios – the outlook is grim at best.

While George W. Bush was no friend to the environment overall, his record on ocean protection is actually not too bad. After convening a commission of experts from various disciplines to report on the state of U.S. oceans, his administration took steps to protect 215 million acres of biologically rich deep sea ocean habitat in the Pacific near Hawaii and Guam. The newly protected areas are off limits to resource extraction and commercial fishing but open for shipping traffic, scientific research and minimal impact recreation – and should provide a boon for fish and other marine species trying to recover from decades of abuse. But while such protections are a huge step in the right direction, they represent less than a drop in the bucket as to what still needs to be done to help fish stocks and marine ecosystems recover.

In light of ongoing threats, President Obama last June set up a task force to craft a national ocean stewardship policy. Led by Nancy Sutley, chair of the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality, the task force is currently working to draft a framework for sustainable management of American coastal and ocean resources. Currently 20 different federal agencies oversee some 140 ocean protection laws; Obama has charged his task force with pulling together all the different authorities and laws to focus attention on addressing the most serious challenges facing the oceans and those who manage them.

Environmentalists have been quick to praise Obama for creating the task force – something called for by Bush’s oceans commission and other experts – but it is unclear how effective it can be given competing political priorities. Some members of Congress are pushing an omnibus ocean protection bill called Oceans-21, which aims to regulate fisheries, establish a network of protected areas, provide an oceans management framework to rescue coasts and off-shore areas, and help ocean life survive global warming.

Fortunately, Americans are not the only ones concerned about the world’s oceans. The United Nations launched its Oceans and Coastal Areas Network – later renamed UN Oceans in 2003 to coordinate ocean and coastal efforts around the world. More recently, several island nations in the western Pacific and Indian oceans formed the Coral Triangle Initiative, adopting a 10-year plan of action to avert growing threats to coral reefs, fish, coastal mangrove buffers and other marine resources across the region. While the challenges may be greater than ever, at least now our oceans are getting some long-overdue attention; only time will tell if we took action in time to stave off a global collapse of marine ecosystems.

CONTACTS: UN Oceans, http://ioc3.unesco.org/un-oceans.

SEND YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS TO: EarthTalk, c/o E The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; earthtalk@emagazine.com. E is a nonprofit publication. Subscribe: www.emagazine.com/subscribe; Request a Free Trial Issue: www.emagazine.com/trial.

Photo from Shutterstock

Filed in: Responsible • Tags: , , , , ,

About the Author:

After a varied past of being a test driver for automotive television programs, a Hollywood studio lackey, and an online media sales director, David is now the publisher and editor of The Good Human. In his spare time he rides motorcycles, drinks good beer, and builds stuff in the garage. You can follow him on Twitter at @thegoodhuman or G+ at Google
Like this post? If so, please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS. Or, if you would prefer, you can subscribe by Email:

Enter your email address in the box below. Address will only be used to deliver a daily email and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Comments (8)

  1. Anne says:

    I find it very interesting that you’ve failed to mention Obama’s newest plan for our oceans – to open them up to commercial drilling.

  2. Lynnea E says:

    In terms of drilling, I’d like to point out that while I wish more were going into sustainable energy, there’s no way oil use is going to disappear in 20 years. It would be much safer for ocean life if oil were drilled closer to home rather than shipped for thousands of miles. It also saves energy and brings in more jobs. Didn’t ever think I’d be saying that….but reality is more important that my idealistic opinion.

  3. david says:

    No, USE wont disappear – but oil is getting harder and harder to get. And scientists everywhere have said we won’t even get the oil off our shores, if at all, for 10-12 years. It’s a political move that will only hurt the environment and do nothing to ween us off oil. It’s pointless.

    As for your email, I am not sure what you want in a reply (I don’t remember receiving it) as I just write this website – I don’t hire anyone.

  4. david says:

    Also, you should note this is a syndicated column – I didn’t write it.

  5. Lynnea E says:

    Yes I read that – doesn’t make my points moot. Oil use will not disappear in 10 years, and yes there is still plenty left. If you’re think GLOBALLY instead of LOCALLY, it’s better and safer for the oceans if oil was drilled closer to home. Not to mention the US would care a lot more about regulations and safety issues on home turf than in developing countries.

    Most of this information comes from my mother, a geologist who has worked for a number of oil companies over the years. She’s sick of the business, and while she is trying to be more humanitarian by working in aid programs to help establish non-corrupt oil departments in developing countries, she’s still seeking more rewarding work. I wrote to you some time ago about suggestions and am still awaiting a reply. Where is a highly esteemed geologist with a big heart to go?

  6. Lynnea E says:

    I am aware this is a blog and not a large business. I was just thinking that you who know so much about environmental issues and developing new sciences might have some creative ideas about where an old profession is finding better, more eco-friendly usage. I was absolutely not suggesting you should (or could) hire my mother.

    Hey, I hate oil as much as the next recycling, bicycling, eco-friendly product buying person, but again just trying to be realistic. And replying to the first comment. I am aware this post is a syndicated column. I was just posting, in relation to ocean health, that the US would wreak less damage if oil wasn’t imported. Obviously, not using oil at all would be the ideal situation.

Leave a Reply